(no subject)
Nov. 24th, 2004 02:16 pmSo the Star reviewed Alexander today. They gave it one star.
I won't see the film until Friday, but I'm sure that I'll find the paper missed the boat. You don't go to an Oliver Stone-directed sandal-epic looking for an academically complex examination of the whys and wherefores of Alexander the Great's rise to power. Questions like How was a young man able to take over the world? are secondary when you're dealing with blockbusters. Duh. Huge CG armies + random sex + "historically accurate" costuming does not a thinking man's picture make. *shakes head* Silly humans.
I won't see the film until Friday, but I'm sure that I'll find the paper missed the boat. You don't go to an Oliver Stone-directed sandal-epic looking for an academically complex examination of the whys and wherefores of Alexander the Great's rise to power. Questions like How was a young man able to take over the world? are secondary when you're dealing with blockbusters. Duh. Huge CG armies + random sex + "historically accurate" costuming does not a thinking man's picture make. *shakes head* Silly humans.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-11-24 11:28 am (UTC)THAT'S IT!!!!!!!!!11
BACK TO WINNIPEG!
(no subject)
Date: 2004-11-24 10:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-11-24 01:11 pm (UTC)Good point. But why not? Sounds like a good story to me. But I never saw Titanic, A Knight's Tale or Pearl Harbor either, so what do I know. I also wish Mr. Stone would come up with his own damn stories instead of bastardizing perfectly good historic events, knowwhutahmean?
Now Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead -- that was a fabulous "what if?" take on history. Well, historic literature.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-11-24 10:39 pm (UTC)Within the two hours of the film, you've gotta show the sex and violence of the story (not the "boring" psychological analysis and brilliant tactical strategizing) because sex and violence will make back in box office all the dough a studio poured into the epic. What was most astonishing about the review I read is that the reviewer seemed to be expecting more from the film.
It's a pity that studios won't believe that intelligence sells. But that's a whole other rant (aka "senior thesis").